The Gospel of Luke

 

Image taken by Pedroivo via Pixabay.

I have finally finished the Gospel of Luke (St. Luke according to the KJV). As I may have mentioned before, I am reading through the King James Version of the Bible "backwards." I started with Revelation and have now read through Luke. The reason? I was challenged several years ago to read through the KJV but I got stuck on the law. The person making this challenge said I needed to read the New Testament so I thought this would be a good way to cut to the chase and also to see a reverse perspective of New Testament to Old rather than the other way around. Since some people read Jesus into the Old Testament anyway, I thought this would be an interesting way to see that perspective.

I should be much further than Luke by now but 2024 has been filled with drama with two relatives passing away (the drama is only related to one of them) and lots of back and forth, in the Bible, out of the Bible, in the Bible. I highly recommend reading each book of the Bible in one sitting but that is harder to do with longer books, like Luke, which has 24 chapters. It's much more meaningful to read books straight through and you get more of a sense of context than reading individual chapters.

I wish I could make a long list of differences I saw between John and Luke (the order I have read only two of the four Gospels) but with such intermittent reading, that is harder to do. I remember my notes from Bible School, that John presents Jesus as the Son of God, whereas Luke presents Jesus as the Son of [Hu]Man[kind]. I think specifically of the reference in Isaiah which Jesus read in the temple, in Luke 4.

17 And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias [Isaiah]. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written,

18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised,

19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord. (KJV, Bible Gateway).

Jesus added that on that day this Scripture was fulfilled. Who wouldn't want to be on the same side of one who brought in a kingdom, The Kingdom, which rescues people in such desperate situations.

The other thing that stuck out to me is when Jesus preached the Sermon on the "Mount," he was not on a mountain but on level ground. In Luke 6,

17 And he came down with them, and stood in the plain... (KJV, Bible Gateway)

One ought be alarmed. Clearly, Luke's record is different. Whereas Matthew's Gospel portrays Jesus as the new Moses, Luke's Gospel is portraying Jesus as the Son of Man, the chief of all humans (really, it's another way of saying Son of God). Matthew's Gospel has a Sermon on the Mount and Luke's Gospel has a Sermon on the Plain.

One also cannot forget that Marconi, the great heretic (Great here does not mean superb) who read his Bible with scissors, so to speak, cherished parts of Luke's Gospel. I don't endorse that in the least but it is worth mentioning that there is an attraction to Luke's Gospel. Oftentimes, I have heard people recommend new Christians or those interested in learning about Jesus, start with John's Gospel. I personally recommend reading Mark's Gospel first since it is believed to be the first Gospel by some contemporary scholars (This is a red herring. I am choosing not to get into the debate about what a "scholar" is. Some would argue that scholars are only those who embrace the documentary hypothesis and other tools that are the result of Biblical Criticism. I think it is arrogant for me to say what consists of a scholar and what doesn't) and it is also the shortest. 

Up next, I'll be reading Mark's Gospel. I hope that will be done in one sitting, but stay tuned to see whether I'm able to accomplish that.